Monday, 17 August, 2026г.
russian english deutsch french spanish portuguese czech greek georgian chinese japanese korean indonesian turkish thai uzbek

пример: покупка автомобиля в Запорожье

 

Guess Which 3 Supreme Court Justices Voted For The Undemocratic Legal Theory

Guess Which 3 Supreme Court Justices Voted For The Undemocratic Legal TheoryУ вашего броузера проблема в совместимости с HTML5

The Supreme Court voted 6-3 to reject the independent state legislature theory. Rayyvana and Ben Gleib break it down on The Watchlist. Watch LIVE on weekdays at 5pm ET. http://youtube.com/watchlisttyt/live

Read more HERE: https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/27/politics/supreme-court-election-clause-case/index.html

“The Supreme Court said Tuesday that the North Carolina Supreme Court did not violate the elections clause of the US Constitution when it invalidated the state’s 2022 congressional map, rejecting a broad version of a controversial legal Independent State Legislature theory pushed by supporters of former President Donald Trump.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the 6-3 opinion.

The case had captured the nation’s attention because Republican lawmakers in North Carolina were asking the justices to adopt a long-dormant legal theory and hold that state courts and other state entities have a limited role in reviewing election rules established by state legislatures when it comes to federal elections.

“State courts retain the authority to apply state constitutional restraints when legislatures act under the power conferred upon them by the Elections Clause,” Roberts wrote.”


The Supreme Court said Tuesday that the North Carolina Supreme Court did not violate the elections clause of the US Constitution when it invalidated the state’s 2022 congressional map, rejecting a broad version of a controversial legal Independent State Legislature theory pushed by supporters of former President Donald Trump.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the 6-3 opinion.

The case had captured the nation’s attention because Republican lawmakers in North Carolina were asking the justices to adopt a long-dormant legal theory and hold that state courts and other state entities have a limited role in reviewing election rules established by state legislatures when it comes to federal elections.

ADVERTISING

“State courts retain the authority to apply state constitutional restraints when legislatures act under the power conferred upon them by the Elections Clause,” Roberts wrote.”

***

Host Jayar Jackson reacts to a must-watch list of videos of the day, which will cover news, politics, society, culture, current events, and more.

Help support our mission and get perks. Membership protects TYT’s independence from corporate ownership and allows us to provide free live shows that speak truth to power for people around the world. See Perks: https://www.tyt.com/join


SUBSCRIBE on YOUTUBE: ☞ http://youtube.com/watchlisttyt
FACEBOOK: ☞ http://www.facebook.com/watchlisttyt
TWITTER: ☞ https://twitter.com/watchlisttyt
INSTAGRAM: ☞ https://instagram.com/watchlisttyt
TWITCH: ☞ http://www.twitch.com/tyt


Merch: http://shoptyt.com

Donate: http://www.tyt.com/go

Website: https://www.tyt.com

App: http://www.tyt.com/app

Newsletters: https://www.tyt.com/newsletters/


If you want to watch more videos from TYT, consider subscribing to other channels in our network:


Indisputable https://www.youtube.com/indisputabletyt

The Young Turks https://www.youtube.com/theyoungturks

The Damage Report https://www.youtube.com/thedamagereport

TYT Sports https://www.youtube.com/tytsports

The Conversation https://www.youtube.com/tytconversation

Rebel HQ https://www.youtube.com/rebelhq

TYT Investigates https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwNJt9PYyN1uyw2XhNIQMMA

#TYT #TheWatchlist #JayarJackson

230627__WL07SupremeCourtRejection

Мой аккаунт