Asia No. 1 Corrupted Judicial events. Taiwanese prosecutors' horrifying smothering habits constitute

It's the best evidence of perjury for the testimonies of the three individuals in L's another lawsuit of libel which are not consistent with each other. As to why Y would make a perjury? Since Y was a community security guard, and he was reproached by me for violations, then why A made a false testimony for that? A was the Director General who acquired payment from community management committee (CMC) for the part of employees' self payment to labor and health insurance premiums by a fraud to the former chairman(2005-2006) of CMC, and put the money into A's own pocket. Later he was ratted out by me who was newly appointed chairman, but Shi-Lin District Prosecutors (SLDP) and Taiwan High Court Prosecutors (THCP) was cheated and fooled round and round by the three persons, and the prosecutors are really held in contempt by our fellow countrymen. Since SLDP and THCP was cheated and fooled by the three persons in the lawsuit of libel, the prosecutors should punish them. Instead of doing this, they blindly wanted to conceal the whole things to somther the joint perjury committed by the 3 persons which was reported by me. It's really the No. 1 corruption made public for prosecutor's office in the history of Taiwanese or Asian judiciary. THCP don't even feel guilty, but defend by sophistry that I proposed replacement of the security squad to our community rally for resolvation. But unfortunately, it didn't pass, THCP said what Gard Y testified that my bring someone to replace him during on his duty in the early next morning was not a perjudice. So let the world be the judge: Taiwan High Court Prosecutors quibbled in sophism and smothered the whole criminal case? Because if we want to replace the security squad, we've got to bring up to be resolved by the above rally before signing the contract with the security company. Guard squad of the new company should first link up for a few days to familiarize themselves with the community. How could it be possible that the last night's meeting dismissed at about 22:30, and that the early Sunday morning in the next day, the security company sleepless all night to sign the contract with the community? Besides, the proposal was even rejected by the rally, and how the Finance Committee as well as the Monitor Committee agreed to sign the contract? These two levels of prosecutors deliberately wanted to be deceived by Y with perjury, and their purpose is to smother criminal cases, and will be held up ridiculed in the world. Another case of encroachment of 2007 community documents was even more outrageous, as Lih made perjury because the suspect who was former chairman (2007~2008) of CMC had helped her before, so she made perjury (prosecutors did not let her surrender a pledge)stated: The documents that were left behind by the deceased Mr. K who sold house to her family was the above-mentioned document that was so called encroachment, but the two-level prosecutors made a fool of themselves by pulling a big boner that K sold their house in 2005. How could it be possible to have a community document created in 2007 be remained by Mr. K in the house which he sold out through turning the clock back to 2005? Moreover, since with what virtues or abilitie, could K own a complete set of community documents that had nothing to do with himself? And therefore, two levels of prosecutors in Taiwan will become the eternal laughing stock at both home and abroad. I hope our monitor survey organization will correct or impeach these corrupt behaviors in time.